

The new narrower, Mario Garcia-redesigned Wall Street Journal is out today. Free on the newsstands and online today, apparently. Romenesko’s got links. Here are some of today’s section fronts and a page about the new design from the reader’s guide. Here’s a PDF of that page.
Garcia says he was already getting positive reader e-mails before dawn. But for his part, web designer Greg Storey says “who in their infinite ivy-league 5th Avenue wisdom spilt McClatchy all over this morning’s Wall Street Journal?”
Update: Here's the full PDF of the Reader's Guide.
Honey, They Shrunk the Column Sigs! (but I love the color added to the back of 'em)
Posted by: Kenny Monteith at January 2, 2007 12:44 PMI have this new issue in my hands already, great job! elegant colors, very neat, I like it! look more attractive, the front page look almost the same, but narrow, but inside look wonderful!, I like MarketPlace and Health and Travel, elegant issue, smart newspaper for smart readers, beautiful!!
Posted by: Tom at January 2, 2007 3:19 PMIt is quite a shocking development indeed compared with the behemoth broadsheet of old, but it does seem quite well executed cover to cover (apart from the typo "highten" on Page G8 of the special eight-page Reader's Guide they included in the paper). I rather dig the skyboxes on the inside fronts, and the overall effect of the redo seems to be a stronger, cleaner read. Publisher Crovitz about 40-plus inches of ink into explaining the new direction.
Posted by: Geoff Giordano at January 3, 2007 3:26 AMAnyone else think the inside section fronts are "inspired" by the National Post in Canada?
Posted by: George at January 3, 2007 7:27 AMHooah! Mario Garcia is a genius. One of the biggest reasons redesigns fail is because the product looks totally different but this is a great change. I like the typefaces but I worry a lot about their body text leading and tracking being too tight. But that's a PDF, I'll pick one up tomorrow in the airport and see.
The use of color - for the Journal - is brilliant and the new breakout boxes are key. In fact, my paper just made up the idea of "summary boxes" last month so I hope when I find one it doesn't look the same as mine. ;)
Great integration. I hope to see more growth and freedom on those section fronts. Air them out!
Posted by: Mike Higdon at January 3, 2007 10:54 PMThis may not be the worst redesign, but is certainly the most consequential. The Journal was a GREAT newspaper. Was. Don't pretend that a quality product like the journal can jettison 20 percent of its content and nothing bad just happened. The short stories, the big type, the narrow feel — at least USA is bright and cheerful. The new Journal is dreadful. I'm saddened that none of the reviews i've read so far is willing to acknowledge this.
Posted by: Ed Weintrob at January 6, 2007 8:48 PMThis may not be the worst redesign, but is certainly the most consequential. The Journal was a GREAT newspaper. Was. Don't pretend that a quality product like the journal can jettison 20 percent of its content and nothing bad just happened. The short stories, the big type, the narrow feel — at least USA is bright and cheerful. The new Journal is dreadful. I'm saddened that none of the reviews i've read so far is willing to acknowledge this.
Posted by: Ed Weintrob at January 6, 2007 8:48 PMIt's been almost two weeks... what happened to my favorite design blog?
Posted by: Billy Kulpa at January 15, 2007 8:07 AMYes, sorry everyone! Major life events have ensued. Actual "content" is forthcoming.
Posted by: Mark at January 16, 2007 12:20 AM