

The Seattle Times and Post-Intelligencer couldn’t print today (except for about 13,000 early copies of the Times) because of a power outage caused by a powerful storm that slammed into the Pacific Northwest Thursday night. Saturday editions might be in jeopardy, as well. Both the Times and the P-I allowed free access today to electronic editions of the print version. Interesting, and certainly an easy thing for the papers to do, considering they already produce the electronic editions and merely had to open up free access to them. But one wonders how useful it really is. You can click on a link at the top of the home page to see 12- to 18-hour-old news in a clunky, difficult-to-navigate interface, or you can go further down the page and find fresh news that’s constantly updated, easy to read and at least has the potential for community interaction.
I’d be curious to know how successful these “E-editions” or things like PressDisplay are. As a newspaper designer, I find them useful as a way to see other papers’ print design, but I can’t imagine actually reading one on a regular basis. They just seem like a very mid-90s, print-centric, “let’s put the newspaper on the Web” kind of solution.
What good is free access to the electronic editions during a power outage?
Posted by: Steven Andrew Miller at December 16, 2006 12:36 AMWell, you can still read online by candlelight or flashlight ... duh!
Posted by: Josh Jackson at December 16, 2006 8:45 AMThe Saturday edition printed, but it was 36 pages, I believe. Sunday should be OK. Crossing my fingers. The press plant is back up and running.
I'm out of power at my house and I wouldn't be surprised if it took a week to come back on. Wind storm of the century, they say.
Posted by: Rich at December 16, 2006 12:33 PMThanks for the update, Rich! Makes me feel bad about whining about my 4.5 hour outage. Went out just as "The Office" was starting and my mouth was literally forming the words "I hope we don't lose power now!" So, really, nothing to bitch about. So good luck and stay warm, pal!
Posted by: Mark at December 16, 2006 1:34 PMI agree that these e-editions seem awkward when you can just read a more updated version online, but there's definitely a good chunk of readers that like them.
We started our e-edition/PDF-style copy less than six months ago, and there are actually a respectable number of paying subscribers.
Most importantly, ABC counts them as paid circulation, which can't yet be said for users/traffic/page views.
Posted by: Josh at December 18, 2006 3:13 PMHi
I just came across this posting and thought I'd share a little bit about why readers do like the full replica newspapers you find on PressDisplay.
Some of our subscribers really like the tradtional "look" of the paper because they know what sections they want to read and it is comfortable for them. They also like the fact that the "whole" paper is available, including classifieds and inserts. You can read stories in the full graphics view (which some might find awkward), but if you like just reading a text view, you can do that too.
Another thing subscribers like is that there is one user interface for all 350+ papers. On other sites like Google News or Yahoo, you can see a snippet of a story, but then you have to click on a link to take you to the newspaper's "unique" site to read the whole thing, which is different from every other newspaper's site. So you keep having to jump around the internet to read different stories from different papers. On sites like PressDisplay, all the papers are there in a familiar format, using a common user interface and powerful browsing, searching, monitoring, RSS, content management, instant translation and sharing tools.
PressDisplay is much more than an aggregated newspaper site and that's why people like it and why they keep coming back. Many have told me it is "addictive". And because they can personalize the site to their preferences, they get the news the way they want to read it.
Hope that helps. You might want to check out The PressDisplay Club to learn more (blog.pressdisplay.com)
Posted by: Gayle Moss at January 3, 2007 12:31 PM