



Seattle Weekly says: "Do journalists in New York do any original thinking at all?"
Business Week says: "I ... was unaware of the Seattle Weekly headline, story or cover art."
Me, I just think it's funny (on several levels!) that on a cover about Bill Gates, Seattle Weekly used, not Microsoft's Comic Sans, but Apple's, er, homage to it.
Whatever the case, BizWeek got it right. If Gates is getting schooled, he should be in the desk, not up at the chalkboard looking like he's ready to conduct an orchestra.
Posted by: Christopher Harrop at June 23, 2006 5:56 AMExcellent point. I didn't catch that, but you're absolutely right. I guess you could chalk that up to poor art direction.
Posted by: roy at June 23, 2006 2:55 PMboth covers are pretty thin on concept ... and coincidences do happen!
Posted by: wes at June 26, 2006 2:50 PMI find it amusing that Seattle Weekly would accuse any other publication of unoriginality. Check out this collection put together last year by SW's in-town competition, The Stranger:
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/BigArt?oid=22082
Posted by: GrammarCop at June 27, 2006 3:23 PMharsh?corrigendum:inefficiencies revolving refuge conjurer mystics?Chantilly choose
Posted by: at June 4, 2009 7:24 PM