

The Kansas City Star’s much-anticipated redesign, which hit some of the features sections a couple weeks ago (see here and here), reached the front page and the rest of the paper today.
Star Editor Mark Zieman has a Q&A here.
Aren’t you just using color and glitz to attract people who don't like to read?
No. If you hate Pepsi, putting it in a pretty can won’t make you drink it. It’s the same with non-readers and newspapers. Instead, we're trying to make the paper more useful - and easier to use - for people who already read us. We already have more than 1 million readers every week - but not every day. We're working to make our paper more relevant, enticing and informative for our occasional readers. We actually believe that comes from better news content, not a prettier design. But if we can give you both, why not do it?
There’s a Web page about the redesign here, with links to, among other things, a Flash slideshow of new pages, a list of the Top 10 changes, an audio slideshow of the new press operations and some PDFs of pages from the 20-page special section on the redesign.
Garcia Media consulted on the job, with Kelly Frankeny as the art director. Jeanne Meyer, Managing Editor for Visuals and New Initiatives, and Tom Dolphens, AME for Art and Design, led the team from the Star.
Mario Garcia penned a column for the special section.
Foremost in our thinking:1. Catering to readers in a hurry,
like you and me. So we have worked hard to create navigational systems that start on Page One. We know that you may have time only to scan the headlines in the morning, so Page One eases that process. We also know that readers appreciate when we alert them to related stories or coverage online, so we will systematically do that as well. The Star, like all modern newspapers, moves into an era for readers who are tech savvy and live in a multimedia world.
Wow! I'm really impressed. Finally we see a real redesign with a modern take on how to present the news in the United States. I really like how easy it is to browse through the paper and enjoy seeing the clearly labeled content and slick design. It looks like a joy to read. Excellent use of color to assist in navigation.
Posted by: Dhyana Sansoucie at June 5, 2006 8:25 AMYou right! just, I like it! and the people love it already! if somebody don't like is right too, but, remember, we work for the readers no for a person! and maybe some designer, just this is something that some designers have forgotten.
Posted by: J. Tony Fernandez-Davila at June 5, 2006 12:23 PMWithout stating an opinion, what's the thinking behind the rail on the local front? Is it movable? does it always reside in the fourth column? Can it be shorter and wider? Are there similar pieces on other fronts?
Posted by: nicole at June 5, 2006 4:34 PMWhen I initially saw it, I thought it was a means for them to get away with not having any vertical rules (save for the breakout/infobox rules you see on the Sports and Local pages).
But overall, it's bold and ambitious, and I like it in general. My folks are subsribers and are currently on vacation. They'll have quite a surprise waiting for them when they get back.
Posted by: Christopher Harrop at June 5, 2006 5:02 PMThen again, I am all for anyone who takes the time to add a quotation mark into the drop cap with the first letter, having seen it omitted numerous times for whatever reason.
Posted by: Christopher Harrop at June 5, 2006 5:04 PMNicole, that rail is very mobile, as you'll see this week. And it is a part of the design for most sections, although Local is the only one that is using it most of the time.
Posted by: gooch at June 5, 2006 5:40 PMIt's fantastic. I have a more complete review on my blog, but I can say that to hold it in your hands, it's a wonderful effort; the more I look at it, the more I think it stands up as one of the better designed papers on the planet. There isn't an element that seems out of place or superfluous. And that might be the best compliment that can be given for news design.
Posted by: Ryan.m. at June 5, 2006 11:40 PMIn addition to the design, check out the "Top 10 Changes" to see what content has been added: double the amount of letters to the editor, a "watchdog" column, "tribute" obits and later deadlines for features and business sections.
No matter how pretty it is, readers like to see themselves in the paper. And the more interactivity is added, the more relevant/popular it will become.
Posted by: Denise Covert at June 6, 2006 7:45 AMAlso, the newspaper already is in the streets, the publishers don't see details they wait for results, and they already have them. Good content, attractive and very well distributed, and the rest whom it matters, we see the beauty and practicidad, the publishers see the rest.
The more important by the end is the people and advertisers like it for sure.
I have to say, yesterday's Star has to be the best newspaper ever published on a slow news Monday. Section A had about 36 pages if I recall.
The pictures and the color ads looked incredible. The new press has rendered every other press in the city obsolete overnight. The color was that good.
Posted by: MV at June 6, 2006 9:21 AMWow, very bold and colorful, and if readers like it all the better. One question is with all that color making changes when you need to get a late score in the mast area of the sports section or a typo out of the brief rail on the metro cover means a lot of replating work for the press folks. Do you have limits on how many color changes you can have?
Posted by: Phil Mahoney at June 7, 2006 6:45 PMPhil: Yeah, we do. We're still figuring out the process. But we have more capacity and more ability to switch quickly. We're trying to keep things we know are late out of the color. But it's not always an easy process.
Posted by: gooch at June 7, 2006 8:51 PMI think I have a new favorite American newspaper. I wonder how many designers are showing this off to their top editors right now as a marvelous example of what a 2006 newspaper should look like. Just spectacular all around. Kudos to everyone in K.C.!
Posted by: Bonita Burton at June 7, 2006 8:54 PMWOW! Roger Miller would be proud. ("Kansas City Star/that's what I are/yodel-eedelay-hee/you oughta see my car...")
Posted by: Douglas E. Jessmer at June 7, 2006 11:44 PMJust two months ago while in Kansas City, I lamented to a colleague that the K.C. Star — a very fine newspaper — suffered from an outdated, now-clunky look. But look at you now! With recent redesigns in St. Louis and now in K.C., Missouri has two metro dailies that are raising the bar for intelligent, engaging design (that reflect the renaissance of their respective downtowns) and solid journalism (long-time staples of each). Congratulations.
Posted by: Gary Mills at June 30, 2006 5:30 PM