

The St. Petersburg Times is taking its young-adult-aimed free weekly tabloid, tbt* (aka "Tampa Bay Times") to Monday-Friday publication starting March 6. The Times says it "will include concise versions of the day's local and national news, with an emphasis on sports, consumer features and entertainment." The tab, which began publishing in September 2004, will be 40 pages and circulate 40,000 copies Monday through Thursday. The Friday edition will be bigger, with a pull-out entertainment section, and will be available all weekend.
This move has prompted the Tampa Tribune to file a federal lawsuit, claiming that the paper's name infringes on their trademark of The Tampa Times, an afternoon paper that merged with the Trib in 1982.
"After years of trying and failing to sell newspapers successfully in Tampa, St. Pete has chosen deception as a strategy for convincing Hillsborough residents to read a Pinellas County newspaper," the lawsuit says. "Instead of adopting a mark that identifies its own product, St. Pete seeks to associate its product with plaintiffs' well-known and historically rich mark, The Tampa Times."
Update: Times AME/Presentation Patty Cox e-mails (and Zach points out in the comments) that the Times still publishes a Tampa edition. Didn't mean to imply otherwise, just that the initiative was eventually scaled down, but I'll concede I may be misremembering that (I'm getting so, so old). The Times A1 is still zoned for Tampa, the extent depending on the news, and the flag is stacked, with "St. Petersburg" smaller and "Times" played up. And the Tampa local section is significantly different. Also, the Times settled the Times of London suit in 1996 by agreeing to pay the Times of London a $12,000 license fee for the right to use The Times for 99 years.
But back to the Tampa Bay Times, see also this blog post by Times media critic Eric Deggans.
Industry convention says such tabloids are a combination starter kit/laboratory for newspapers -- getting younger readers to consider a regular newspaper habit, while acting as an incubator for fresh approaches which can be imported to the mothership publication. Much as I love my friends who work at tbt*, I worry that such publications really encourage young readers to see newspapers as irrelevant to their lives outside of entertainment. That's not a perception which will help traditional newspapers improve their brand much.
Since this in our legal department at this point, I can't/won't say much, but one correction to the post: The Times does produce a daily Tampa Edition. Most notably, the edition contains a distinct Metro section edited and designed only for Tampa readers. The edition also includes zoned pages in sports and often a zoned 1A to include stories of interest to Tampa and Hillsborough county residents. The front page flag indeed changes for the Tampa edition.
Posted by: Zach at February 20, 2006 8:44 AMMy memory is not quite as hazy -- I worked at the Tampa Trib when the Times rolled out this special Hillsborough format. I seem to recall the Time spending a small fortune on staffing and such and not picking up very many readers in Hillsborough because folks in Tampa still identified with the Trib.
Of course that was 13 years ago; I presume the Times has picked up a few more readers since then.
Haven't read either paper since then so I'll leave it at that.
Posted by: tom at February 21, 2006 6:08 AM
Thanks, Tom. That was my impression, as well, but didn't really have anything to back that up. I lived in Tampa at the time (perhaps we were neighbors!), but worked in Lakeland, so I wasn't very well plugged into the bay-area newspaper scene. Just heard a few things here or there. But enough, of course, for a seat-of-the-pants blog post!
Posted by: Mark at February 21, 2006 11:15 AMThe Tampa Trib used to include a much smaller "The Tampa Times" as part of its flag, which I assume was a legal maneuver to protect that trademark. Does it still do that somewhere in the paper? I'd think that would make their case stronger, but IANAL and all that.
It's been almost ten years since our local Gannett PM daily (the Rochester Times-Union) shut down, and the company's made no use whatsoever of that trademark since then in its surviving AM daily. I'd think someone wanting to use that name in a few years would be on pretty solid ground.
And in Philadelphia, someone revived the old "Evening Bulletin" name a couple of years ago. I don't know if it's still being published or not, but it certainly had no connection to the paper that folded in 1982, whose assets (or at least subscriber list) were sold to the Inky.
Posted by: Scott Fybush at February 22, 2006 2:30 PM