The Guardian's "Shrinkage," Nudge Nudge, Wink Wink, Saynomore

12:37 AM, August 14, 2005

The Independent today runs a story about The Guardian's impending switch to the Berliner format. Tragically, the story begins thusly:

Most of those on the receiving end agree that size isn't everything. Although there are areas still where a good big 'un will beat a good little 'un, small - while not necessarily uniformly beautiful - tends these days to give greater satisfaction.

We're talking about newspapers here, of course. ...


Oh, well, yeah. Of course! Memo to newspapers everywhere: Can we please retire the hoary old misdirection lede? When you have to explain in the second paragraph what you're talking about in the first, not only is it not funny, it's a big ol' sign to try again.

Anyway, as far as actual content, the story quotes a Times of London exec who supposedly has seen a Guardian prototype.

"I thought it was design conceit rather than an exercise in reality - it had a very subtle splash headline and a clever photograph of the kind that comes along only about once a month. Well, readers don't want subtle. They want a headline that sells the story and they want immediacy. There's a problem, too, in that Berliner folded to fit into a supermarket or petrol station sales box will still show only half of the front page, which means it can't have the impact of the Indy or The Times. And I'm not sure they have yet realised that changing the format means more than simply moving a lot of furniture around the house."

>Has the Berliner come too late to save 'The Guardian'? [The Independent]


Comments
Heads up: After you hit "post" things may be slow and you may get an error. Most likely, your comment did post. Apologies. I'm looking for a fix.

Seems to me like that Times exec misunderstands what The Guardian's people are trying to achieve by the switch. By which I mean, they're not really trying to change direction.

They've always been ones for subtle headlines; a change to something more forceful or direct would signify a shift downmarket, no?

And as for clever photographs: The Guardian has a knack for picking beautiful, striking cover images (and they have some excellent photographers on their staff, like Dan Chung). That's something that the Times (conservative in both design and content) isn't particularly renowned for.

Posted by: MacDara at August 14, 2005 2:21 AM

That someone from The Times is commenting on the Graun's design values is quite amusing. I can't think of a 'highbrow' paper in the UK that's less visually enticing.

Posted by: nick at August 14, 2005 5:05 AM

Without commenting on the news design of either The Guardian or The Times, I agree with the Times exec's sentiment. Too many times, a front page is designed without any consideration for how it may look in a news rack or the headline completely fails to capture any interest. That doesn't mean the world has to convert to tabs, either.

Posted by: MV at August 14, 2005 2:43 PM

Anyone have a link to the article?

Posted by: Hot Salsa Website Development at August 20, 2005 7:32 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

































Home

About



Archives

Search

RSS 1.0 feed

RSS 2.0 feed