

The Globe and Mail reported Tuesday that the Toronto Star is revamping its Sunday paper but has decided not to make it a tabloid.
Star editor-in-chief Giles Gherson said that while the paper considered a tabloid size for the revamped Sunday paper, it rejected the idea. Instead it will convert to a magazine-style broadsheet with better use of graphics and colour than the existing format, which currently looks similar to the news-heavy weekday and Saturday papers. "It's going to be kind of a magazine style with a broadsheet format," Mr. Gherson said. "The feel and the tone of it and the sensibility of it will be very much like a magazine."Most of the story, however, is spent worrying if the National Post's new publisher Les Pyette is turning that paper into a tabloid in spirit, if not in physical form. "All I did was get them to put a bigger headline on the main story," Pyette says. But! The mighty Globe and Mail (motto: "The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures." Zzzzzzzzzz) will not let such obvious misdirection stand!The Sunday paper will still make room for breaking news but will now concentrate on feature material. The Sunday edition will also function as a test ground for features or formats that could be shifted to the weekday or Saturday papers, he added.
Newspaper observers say, however, that the huge new headlines, "cheeky" wording, and sometimes massive photographs that have appeared in the Post in the past 10 days give the impression of a tabloid sensibility emerging at the paper, even while it keeps its broadsheet size.

Sure, bigger heds and the shorter, punchier words that bigger heds require. Big whoop. Not quite what the scandalized G&M calls "huge" and "screaming." About 40-45 percent bigger than those October heds, but you need more heft when you banner a hed in a broadsheet. (And those heds are still smaller than they've used in the past on big news days) Promos under the flag are a bit deeper. Photos don't really look any bigger, though. The Post has always given good size to their A1 photos.
So I don't know about you hosers, but I don't see much smoke there, eh?
>Star, Post tweak designs [The Globe and Mail]
The new design is tabloidish.....Eye-catching, but catty. I think entertainment photographs on the front page suck.
Posted by: Boneyard at December 22, 2004 6:30 AM"JENNA GOES GHETTO"
I might forgive the occassional Hollywood front page photo on a ridiculously slow news day, but that is just weak, no matter what the typeface.
Posted by: Mark Vasto at December 22, 2004 10:46 PMYeah, that Jenna Bush photo is a bit much. Not to mention the "Hollywood roars" photo the day after.
Not to mention the clutter between the giant teases up top and the giant headlines up top.
What was my favorite Canadian paper, respected for its class and control, is, um, now not my favorite. Well, as long as they don't mess with the Globe and Mail, I suppose I'll survive.
I think the bigger headlines are an improvement, it provides a stronger entry point (needed with all that's going on in the flag promos) and better clarity on the lead story. I think the entertainment photos are an different issue than the headline sizes. On the photos, yeah there are a couple hear that seem pretty fluffy. But then again out of six samples, only two are entertainment. You still have two sports and two news. Guess I'll keep an eye on newseum to look for more of a pattern before passing judgement. :)
Posted by: Paul Wallen at December 23, 2004 6:08 AMUm, "here" that is. Don't you hate it when you post embarrassing spelling errors and can't fix them?
Posted by: Paul Wallen at December 23, 2004 6:09 AMI'm with you, Paul. Perhaps they are going "tabloid," but that's a pretty difficult judgment to make on one week's papers. That didn't stop the Globe and Mail and their anonymous "observers," though.
Posted by: newsdesigner at December 23, 2004 4:37 PM